Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is that DFS is really a not a game of ability. At the least, it is not the real way we play it!
Western Virginia and Delaware are two states that haven’t any plans to legalize fantasy that is daily in the near future, as well as for two different reasons. Two attorneys general, 400 miles aside, have demonstrated two very different opinions on the legality associated with contests over days gone by day or two.
On West Virginia’s AG ruled that there was no need to legalize DFS because it was prominently a game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law monday.
‘We read state legislation to prohibit only betting upon games decided at least predominantly by chance,’ penned Morrisey in his opinion. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’
A matter for the legislature whether West Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the first US state to do at the beginning of the year, is of course.
Delaware Pulls the Plug
In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS last week, with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests were essentially games of chance.
‘Relying on the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case law, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that involve payment for playing and financial rewards constitute gambling because possibility, compared to skill, is the dominant factor in the results of these contests,’ said Denn.
‘The most skilled participants might lose and less skilled participants might win because of exactly what actually happens during the real-life game. In other terms, real-life players are human being and human behavior is unpredictable.
‘While it is acknowledged that specific individuals may use their particular recreations knowledge in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating in such contests, that factor alone doesn’t result in the contests games of ability.’
Precursor to Regulation?
Denn said that he’d written cease and desist letters to DFS sites running in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no statement that is formal any operator on the problem, nor any indication of whether they mean to comply.
Of course, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and control DFS as time goes on; certainly, comparable rulings from DA’s in other states have shown become a catalyst for the passing such legislation, as had been the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.
A bill to manage DFS was introduced within the Delaware House at zero hour at the end of the legislative session on 30 June, but could was too late be pushed through.
‘we have been sure that many Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating in the full array of fantasy recreations competitions, including those that require payment for participation and have cash honors,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such competitions can be offered legally, the DOJ must enforce the law.’
RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to need answers concerning the FBI’s recommendation towards the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton.
On July 6, FBI Director James Comey said Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state was careless, but did not warrant criminal fees.
US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing with all the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday about the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her private email server usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the homely house to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.
RAWA seeks to replace the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years ago, the DOJ issued an opinion saying the Wire Act applied only to online activities betting, efficiently opening states to legalize online casinos.
Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul federal law. He also doesn’t believe the division is being candid in just how it’s responding to Comey’s findings.
Pleading the Fifth
The morning after their agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing classified emails on non-secure servers, Comey met with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the chairman.
As he did with Comey, Chaffetz did his best to take full advantage of the five minutes he had with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday although he didn’t have the luxury of as much interview time. As AG, Lynch is theoretically Comey’s boss, because the FBI is really a division associated with DOJ.
But Lynch deflected one question after another, much towards the chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving answers that are specific Chaffetz’ ongoing assault of ‘Is it legal or illegal?’
‘ Is it illegal or legal to talk about classified information with somebody who doesn’t have security approval?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or unlawful to provide access to somebody who does not have the requisite protection clearance to see classified material? Could it be legal or illegal to keep, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’
When Lynch regularly and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the standing that is legal some of these dilemmas, Chaffetz’ frustration was abundant and unhidden.
‘The shortage of quality you give this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, I wish I had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.
Sanders Endorses Clinton
Because of the email scandal ( at least legitimately) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the nod that is official her former nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
‘Secretary Clinton has won the nomination that is democratic’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the previous secretary of state and First Lady. ‘we intend to do everything I could to make certain she will be the president that is next of United States.’
Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by straight away releasing an advertising showcasing the various times Sanders said Clinton had been unfit become president.
Bush and Obama Unite, for just One Brief Shining Minute
Meanwhile, a moment that is rare of between the governmental parties emerged on July 12 in Dallas. During a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together so that they can honor those killed by way of a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in an attack that is sniper
Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we can decide that people like this killer will fail ultimately. They shall not drive us apart. We can choose to come together while making our country reflect the great inside us, the hopes and simple dreams we share.’
Before Obama, Bush mentioned the selflessness of police officers everywhere.
‘Most of us suppose if the minute called we would risk our lives to protect a spouse or a child,’ the former president said for it. ‘Those wearing the uniform assume that danger for the safety of strangers [at all times].’
Further feedback about gun control and the Black Lives Matter movement through the service from Obama received critique from some segments, nonetheless, with many saying it was not the right spot or time to address politically loaded issues.
Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Autumn
Billionaire and anti-Internet gambling proponent Sheldon Adelson is likely happy to master Pennsylvania online gambling is being delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/ haaretz.com)
Pennsylvania on the web gambling has been pushed aside in Harrisburg until the fall. That is the outcome that is unfortunate iGambling proponents after lawmakers within the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the last several months.
At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a bipartisan budget plan to become law without their signature. The $31.5 billion spending blueprint shall increase shelling out for education and provide resources to combat their state’s heroin epidemic.
The main issue is just how to pay it off. Based on whom’s counting, the appropriations bill produces a $1-2 billion shortfall.
Largely pushed by Republicans within the General Assembly, gambling expansion is seen as one perfect untapped resource that may help pay for the master plan. Nevertheless the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and perhaps not sometime reconvene until this fall.
Gambling on Hold
Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion under consideration would have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate fantasy that is daily (DFS), and legalize on the web gambling.
Current land-based casinos would end up being the only ones permitted to offer Internet gambling. Licenses were expected to price operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 %.
‘Regulating and taxing interactive gaming in Pennsylvania is really a viable option that will benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in belated June. ‘Before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of their hard-earned money, we must consider innovative revenue sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent.’
Gambling certainly won’t over come the billion-dollar space, however it would help.
Lawmakers estimate $100 million will be created for Harrisburg in the first year alone mainly due to upfront certification fees. That means five to 10 percent regarding the budget gap could possibly be solved through gambling expansion.
State leaders are targeting an extra $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes sold, imposing a six percent taxation on digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.
Spend Now, Spend Later
Anyone with credit cards knows how important it’s to cover on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their leaders that are electedn’t as financially versed.
State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), president of the state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action will be forthcoming.
‘One hundred million bucks in the scope of a $31.5 billion budget . . . it is not required right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator added, nonetheless, that the likelihood of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’
Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly didn’t send him a way that is calculated pay because of its budget.
‘The General Assembly has a responsibility that is constitutional pass a sustainable revenue package to pay for what they desire to invest,’ Wolf stated this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our kids, seniors, and our many susceptible to bring this across the finish line.’
Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Customer Rights Group
Quebec’s plan to block online gambling website faces a challenge it is in direct conflict with federal law. (Image: gamingintelligence.com)
Quebec’s intends to force ISP’s to block access to unlicensed gambling is being put to the test by a federal consumer rights team. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection to a legislation, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents through the markets that are unregulated.
The bill’s supporters claim that its aim is to ‘improve general public wellness’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.
But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology lawyers, plus the ISPs themselves, have actually accused the Quebec federal government of setting a precedent that is dangerous putting commercial gain above the freedom associated with internet. The plans, which were drafted into the provinces March 2015 budget predict the scheme will boost government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.
Price to Consumers
These gains will come at the expense that is huge of companies, that have said that the disruption to their infrastructures could be enormous because they could have to redesign their sites from the ground up. The cost of this will be passed onto consumers.
The PIAC filing states that Quebec is in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the information or influence[ing] this is or intent behind telecommunications carried unless it has approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission by it for the public.